Since the 13th
century, Pandharpur in Maharashtra became a birthplace of a religious movement
which was born locally but had a universal appeal, going beyond caste and
religious identity. This movement was given life to by a saint called Pundalik. According to Bahirat (4 p.6), Pundalik
lived before the eighth century A.D. It is
believed that in his younger days, soon after his marriage Pundalik began to
neglect his parents. However one day, an encounter with the divine, reformed
him and he became a devoted son. As the story goes, Lord Krishna and his
consort, Rukmini chanced upon Pundalik’s hut in the forest on a rainy day.
Pundalik was busy attending to his parents and did not rise immediately to pay
his respects to the deity but hurled a brick in His direction for Him to stand
on without getting His feet wet. Pleased with Pundalik’s devotion to his
parents, Lord Krishna asked Pundalik to worship Him as Vithoba i.e. the one who
stood on a brick. At this scene, a form of Krishna arose standing on a brick,
around which the temple of Pandharpur was later built.
Interestingly
the name ‘Pandharpur’ is derived from Pandurang – one of the many names of Lord
Shiva, moreover the temple of Pandharpur, dedicated to Lord Krishan, an
incarnation of Vishnu, is surrounded by Shaivite temples. Perhaps an indication
that the universal Truth exists beyond all different forms and cults of
worship.
Hence from 13th
century on wards Pandharpur became place of pilgrimage for the Warkari Bhakti
movement. Most Marathi sant poets
who worshipped Vithoba (Krishna, an avatar of Vishnu) and all those who
followed their teachings form a part of this movement. The Warkaris identify
with a succession of over fifty poet saints who lived over a period of five
hundred years. Among whom the major four are, the outcaste Brahmin- Dnyaneshwar or Jnandev (1275-1296); the tailor Namdeva (1270-1350); Eknath
(1533-1599) who was a householder Brahmin and the editor of Dnyaneshwari; the
shudra poet saint Tukaram (1608-1659); and Ramdas (1608-1681) who is considered
as a political saint and teacher of Shivaji.
Sant Dnyaneshwar, image credits: Wikipedia
|
Dnyaneshwar is one of the greatest poet saints
of medieval India . In a short life span, he produced a stupendous amount of
spiritual works which included a
major philosophical treatise (the Amritanubhava), a large
number of religious poems (called abhangas), and an
extensive poetic commentary on the Bhagavad Gita (titled,
after his name, Dnyaneshwari). His works also include Changadeva-Pasashthi
(containing sixty-five verses addressed to a Hathayogi called Changadeva), Haripatha
(containing a collection of twenty eight Abhangas) and Namana (a
hymn containing hundred and eight stanzas in praise to the Lord of the universe).
Dnyaneshwar, at a very tender age, became an ‘outcaste Brahmin’
because of his father’s actions. His father was a Brahmin named Vithalpant
from Alandi in Maharashtra. Vithalpant left his wife and children to become a sanyasin
(ascetic). However after being chided by his guru, Ramanand for abandoning
his true ‘dharma’ of looking after his family as a householder, Vithalpant
returned to his family. Once back in Alandi, he and his wife were
excommunicated by the ruling Brahmin elite who denounced him for mixing up
"life stages" and for contaminating sannyasa with
worldly family concerns. But the fact was that Vithalpant was no sinner, in
fact he had shown the courage and selflessness to return to his family to
perform his duties and sacrificed his
desire for renunciation. However he became a victim of Brahamanical tyranny. Ultimately
Vithalpant and his wife Rukmini committed suicide. At this time Dnyaneshwar was merely eight years old.
Vithalpant's story proved that the path to God leads through the
world, universal love and service of humanity. This path is
available to all and is not the exclusive right of Pundits and Brahmins. The priests and Brahmins, in their arrogance, claim to "possess" God by
virtue of their Vedic knowledge (jnana) and rituals. In their ignorance
they do not know that the divine can never be possessed but can only be pursued
through a life of service.
Dnyaneshwar is
believed to have befriended the poet-saint Namadeva who was by some five years
his senior, when the two first met in Pandharpur. Dnyaneshwar’s meeting with this great Sant was
of great significance in shaping his philosophy which was later to become the
foundation of the bhakti cult in Maharashtra.While in Pandharpur,
Jnanadeva became a devotee of the god Vithoba . The two saints went on a pilgrimage
together, visiting most of the holy places in northern India, including Benaras
and Delhi. Following this journey, they returned to Pandharpur (in 1296) where
a great festival was held in their honour. This festival was attended by many
contemporary saints like Goroba the potter, Sanvata the gardener, Chokhoba the
untouchable, Parisa Bhagavat the Brahmin. At the end of this festival Dnyaneshwar expressed the wish to return to Alandi and to
enter sanjivan samadhi.
Dnyaneshwar’s writings
are not in Sanskrit but in popular
Marathi. They are based on his own life experiences, a
life reflectively lived. He was a thinker and a poet as is evident in both his Jnaneshvari and his Amritanubhava – works well known for their searching insights and poetic style.
He composed the Amritanubhava, a philosophical poem at the behest
of his elder brother and guru, Nivrittinath, at a time when Jnanadeva was
probably in his late teens. According to some scholars while the Dnyaneshwari
appeals to the masses, the Amritanubhava appeals mainly to the learned. It is
more argumentative. As its title indicates, Amritanubhava is nectar of wisedom derived from direct experience and it gives a glimpse into the nature of ultimate
experience. It is meant to serve as a guide to the understanding of "Brahman" or "being" According to Dnyaneshwar, being is not an object of
thought, but what allows thought to happen in the first place.
He argues that sense (or sensory) experience only '"makes sense" in light of another, deeper understanding; similarly, reason is "rational" only by exceeding itself. For him the truth of experience is not validated or authenticated by scriptures; but scriptures gain their authoritative standing through their agreement with experiential truth. He says that the absolute does not prove or disprove itself with the help of any norms or methods of knowledge....These methods are like a lamp lit at midday which neither spread light nor dispel darkness.
He further argues that words to describe the state of Being are not self-contained, each points beyond itself like the symbols of Jung, which stand for something more than their obvious meaning. In Amritanubhava he says, "Being by itself, the absolute, is beyond the ordinary conceptions of existence and non-existence."....." Looked at from this angle, the scriptural words appear as "the residues of our thought"; in the light of being itself, "they vanish like the clouds that shower rain, or like the streams that flow into the sea or the paths that reach their goal." He further adds that "if the situation is such that nothing at all exists, who then knows [and can say] that there is nothing? Hence, the theory of emptiness (as nothing) appears as an "unjust imputation" to being: For, "if the extinguisher of a light is extinguished along with the light, who knows that there is no light?"
He argues that sense (or sensory) experience only '"makes sense" in light of another, deeper understanding; similarly, reason is "rational" only by exceeding itself. For him the truth of experience is not validated or authenticated by scriptures; but scriptures gain their authoritative standing through their agreement with experiential truth. He says that the absolute does not prove or disprove itself with the help of any norms or methods of knowledge....These methods are like a lamp lit at midday which neither spread light nor dispel darkness.
He further argues that words to describe the state of Being are not self-contained, each points beyond itself like the symbols of Jung, which stand for something more than their obvious meaning. In Amritanubhava he says, "Being by itself, the absolute, is beyond the ordinary conceptions of existence and non-existence."....." Looked at from this angle, the scriptural words appear as "the residues of our thought"; in the light of being itself, "they vanish like the clouds that shower rain, or like the streams that flow into the sea or the paths that reach their goal." He further adds that "if the situation is such that nothing at all exists, who then knows [and can say] that there is nothing? Hence, the theory of emptiness (as nothing) appears as an "unjust imputation" to being: For, "if the extinguisher of a light is extinguished along with the light, who knows that there is no light?"
Dnyaneshwari, was completed in 1290 A.D. It was written in Old Marathi and was
initially called Bhavartha-deepika . He wrote it on the instructions of his older brother and Guru Nivruttinath who
wanted to bring to the common man the Vedanta philosophy of Upanishads, which
till then was available only to the Sanskrit-knowing pundits. Since then
Dnyaneshwari, with its anti-Brahmanical overtones, has been a timeless
spiritual guide providing knowledge and inspiration to all. It is still the
most respected religious text in Maharashtra and has been the foundation of
bhakti tradition there: a tradition so old that its exact origin cannot be pin
pointed. It is continuous and free flowing like a river and yet without an
organised structure.
The Warkari movement or sampraday, is an inner
religion of the heart which advocates ethical human behavior and classless
values and therefore has a wider appeal than the caste-based organised Hindu
religion which has rigid orthodox rules of behavior, is ritual based and
requires the mediatory role of Brahmins. While in its earlier form this
movement was open to all, both Hindus and non-Hindus, over the years it appears
to have lost its pluralistic nature.
Following are a few lines from the English translation of Dnyaneshwari by Dr. Ravin Thatte, it talks about people mired in rituals :
"They quote the scriptures for these acts
Expect the heavens for these acts
Little realizing what are the facts
Pleasure is their only aim
Reward their only game
Rigid rituals again and again
This is religion only in name"
References:
1.Jnanadeva and the
Warkari Movement by Prof. Fred Dallmayr,
Ph.D.
(http://www.here-now4u.de/eng/jnanadeva_and_the_warkari_move.htm)
2. Thatte, R. 2012. A Miraculous Rendering on the Bhagwat Geeta by Sant Dnyaneshwa. Shree Book Center, Mumbai, India
3. Bahirat, B.P. 1956, The Philosophy of Jnandeva. Pandharpur Research Society, Pandharpur, Maharashtra, India.
4. Schomer, Karine, W. H.
McLeod. 1987. The Sants:
Studies in a Devotional Tradition of India. Motilal Banarasidas. Delhi.